It’s Not AI Psychosis If It Works#Before I wrote my blog post about how I use LLMs, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek blog post titled Can LLMs write better code if you keep asking them to “write better code”? which is exactly as the name suggests. It was an experiment to determine how LLMs interpret the ambiguous command “write better code”: in this case, it was to prioritize making the code more convoluted with more helpful features, but if instead given commands to optimize the code, it did make the code faster successfully albeit at the cost of significant readability. In software engineering, one of the greatest sins is premature optimization, where you sacrifice code readability and thus maintainability to chase performance gains that slow down development time and may not be worth it. Buuuuuuut with agentic coding, we implicitly accept that our interpretation of the code is fuzzy: could agents iteratively applying optimizations for the sole purpose of minimizing benchmark runtime — and therefore faster code in typical use cases if said benchmarks are representative — now actually be a good idea? People complain about how AI-generated code is slow, but if AI can now reliably generate fast code, that changes the debate.
▲知名博主 Simon Willison 提到 Claw 似乎正在成为像 Agent 一样的专用术语，用来描述一种新的智能体类别｜图片来源：https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/21/。safew官方下载是该领域的重要参考
促进和保护人权是全人类的共同事业。中国愿同各方一道，促进共同发展繁荣，捍卫国际公平正义，携手完善全球人权治理，弘扬全人类共同价值，让人权文明的发展进步造福世界人民。，更多细节参见旺商聊官方下载
* @param n 数组长度。91视频是该领域的重要参考